Should we not debate on the unconstitutional move of President of Nepal

Plato the philosopher of ancient Greece had drafted the norms and values of state and government, after the death of socrate which had deeply affected his thoughts and made him to such conclusion. From since then thoughts, ways, principles and philosophies in relation to state have been ever changing or developing. The ideas of democracy, personal freedom and constitution has reached to a situation as can be said developed for the ground reality today.
But recent development in Nepali politics in Nepali politics proves the aliveness of Marxism. It says the class in power will only appreciate norms and values or constitution until it fulfills their class interest and will not hesitate to go against it paying any price. President of Nepal and other related parties who shout for freedom and constitution are today them self against it. The decision of executive was openly challenged by a ceremonial head of the state, which is nowhere mentioned in the interim constitution. And this is not only the limit but they go as far as to block the issue to be debated in the people's elected house. They themselves challenge their own system of governance. The hunger to misuse the power has made them such downtrodden that the loosing candidate and non candidates of election are now in the government.
The only conclusion to such a situation remains is the Direct Democracy. People those who had voted should now decide their fate themselves. They know the situation better and can handle better.